22 August 2007

Limiting myself to six...

No, not six French fries or six glasses of wine. I'm talking about pictures. Ones taken with the new camera. The limit is not on taking just six, it means just posting just six. Today.

Yesterday we had a bright sunny afternoon. I took the dog out for a walk in the vineyard about 4:00 p.m.

You can click on the pictures to enlarge them on your screen.

A dog's-eye view of a walk in the vineyard

Even in bright sunlight, using the LCD screen on the back of the camera to frame pictures is okay. It had better be, since the camera has no other viewfinder. Only once or twice did I have a hard time seeing what I was taking a picture of because of bright sun on the screen or too many reflections.

Grapes in autumn colors

Callie was bound to notice the grapes sooner or later. I keep stopping to take pictures of the beautiful clusters hanging off the grape vines. I don't want her to eat any. First of all, the grapes belong to somebody else and will be used to make Touraine wines. And secondly, grapes and raisins can make dogs very sick, according to what I've read.

Did I forget to mention that today is Callie's six-month birthday? She was born February 22.

"What are these things he keeps pointing that silver box at?"

I want you to know what a strict limit six pictures is. I spent about 45 minutes out in the vineyard with the dog and in that amount of time I took... this is embarrassing... 120 pictures. About 25 of those are ones I would consider posting on the blog. There are a lot of near-duplicates in the full batch, where I took extra shots from a slightly different angle or with slightly different camera settings. So it's not a bad as it seems. But still...

More autumn colors: a grape leaf

Obviously, the pictures I take with this camera have good color and clarity. And it is so light to carry around compared to the other camera I used to use on my walks in the vineyard.

When I got back to the house, I looked out the kitchen window and saw that Maryvonne across the street had company. They were sitting outside, enjoying the afternoon sun. I snapped this telephoto picture through the window. I don't think they noticed me taking their picture.

Catching the last rays of afternoon sun

I'm more than happy with the TZ3's zoom, and the macro seems to work well too. The TZ3 is the new Panasonic Lumix digital camera I got last week. It has a 10x zoom.

Our vegetable garden isn't doing great. The weather has been too damp and cold for tomatoes and aubergines. It was raining again during the night, and I think the forecast for today is not good. But we planted a pumpkin patch out back, on top of what used to be the compost pile. We had moved the pile to a different location, and wanted to plant something to fill in that spot.

Pumpkins

I think we are going to have a ton of pumpkins this year. That might seem obvious, since each pumpkin will weigh about a ton when it's fully grown. I see lots of pumpkin soup and pumpkin pies in our future.

Okay, that's it for today.

21 August 2007

Albundigas and Mexican tortillas

Ever since I got my new camera, it's been raining. Yesterday I poured 11 mm out of the rain gauge, and this morning 20 more millimeters had accumulated in there. So that's 31 mm since Saturday — about 1¼ inches. That's a lot for mid-August.

It's soup weather, with temperatures in the 60s. In winter we'd pay good money for weather this "nice" — it's much colder in January, but looking out the window you wouldn't be able to see much difference. This is August, pour l'amour de Dieu ! Oh yeah, there are leaves on the trees, which there aren't in January, but it's that same leaden gray sky.

Sopa de albóndigas
on a chilly August day in the Loire Valley

So when nature gives you soup weather, what do you do? You make soup. After all, the temperature in the house is just 19ºC (that's 66ºF) and no, we don't have air conditioning. It's actually nice to have a pot of soup bubbling on the stove.

A few days ago, I was looking up something up in the Larousse Gastronomique (I do that all the time) — oh yeah, I was looking up andouillette. I opened the book and the first word that jumped out at me was albundigas. What? It's a word I know better with the spelling albóndigas, as in sopa de albóndigas, Mexican meatball soup. I went to the store the next morning and bought meat to make the meatballs.

Consulting the Larousse Gastronomique

It's strange what you find in the Larousse Gastronomique. It would never have occurred to me to look for albóndigas soup in the classic French cookbook, which was first published in 1938, I believe, and updated in 1967 (that's the edition I have).

The recipe looks pretty good. It says to use 250 grams (about half a pound) of beef, veal, or pork fillet. Sauté some onions and garlic, sprinkle on some flour as a thickener, and then grind the meat and mix it with the cooked onions and garlic. When you grind the meat, also run three green peppers (it says piments verts), some cilantro or marjoram, some thyme, and some breadcrumbs through the meat grinder and mix all that in too. Add an egg and a little broth to moisten the stuffing and put it in a pastry bag.

Squeeze out little dumplings of the meat stuffing, cutting them off with a knife and dropping them into boiling consommé to cook. The Larousse calls them quenelles and says to poach them in the consommé until they are done. Then, at the last minute, peel, seed, and chop three fresh tomatoes, cook them lightly in a pan with butter, and add them to the soup with the meat quenelles. That sounds like a mild but refined French version of albóndigas soup (unless those piments verts are really hot peppers).

Brawley, California — 17 February 2001

I know sopa de albóndigas from the time I spent down in the desert in Southern California, south of Palm Springs, visiting friends. There is a restaurant in the town of Brawley, in the Imperial Valley south of the Salton Sea, called Brownie's Diner. It's only a few dozen miles from the Mexican border, and a lot of the people who live and work in Brawley, El Centro, and the other Imperial Valley towns are Mexicans who work in the fields and local businesses.

Brownie's Diner in Brawley, California — 17 February 2002.
No, I don't know the people in the picture, and we were
not riding motorcycles that day. But a lot of people were.

I remember the albóndigas soup at Brownie's as a light broth with some tomato in it but full of chunks of carrots, onions, and celery along with the delicious meatballs. I can't remember if the meatballs were made with rice or not — that seems to be the classic style — or if they included mint leaves among the herbs that flavored them — that seems to be classic too. Here's a recipe for sopa de albóndigas that is supposed to be the real thing.

Making masa harina tortillas with the tortilla press

So I made albóndigas soup yesterday and Walt made corn tortillas. We have a tortilla press, thanks to our friends Chris and Tony, who hauled it to Paris from San Francisco last April. You know these are good friends when they are willing to carry something so heavy in their bags all the way across a continent and an ocean. Merci, merci, merci. Or should I say grácias, grácias, grácias?

Authentic corn tortillas

For the albóndigas I used about 600 grams of lean beef stew meat and 200 grams of pork lardons — plain (nature), not salted or smoked — which is chunks of pork side meat. I flavored the meatballs with fresh oregano and parsley, some chili powder, a good pinch of cumin, and of course onions and garlic. I didn't put rice in them, but breadcrumbs, and a couple of eggs.

Albóndigas, or Mexican-style meatballs

Making the broth for the soup was an exercise in cleaning out the freezer. I had a pint of plain chicken stock, a pint of water I had cooked swiss chard in, a pint some something labeled "spinach broth," and a pint of liquid I squeezed out of roasted zucchini pulp. I added a can of chopped tomatoes and their juice, and some chili powder, cumin, and hot paprika. That made a big pot of broth to poach the meatballs in.

Broth, tomatoes, vegetables, and meatballs

Walt says what I made resembled couscous broth more than the sopa de albóndigas he remembers. I did put in more tomato than was called for in the recipes, but I had a whole big can and wanted to use all of it. I also put in a squirt of the North African hot red-pepper paste called harissa. The vegetables are carrots, onions, zucchini, green beans, and swiss chard.

Because it resembles couscous broth, today we're going to eat some more of it but with couscous grain instead of tortillas. And we took a couple of North African merguez (lamb) sausages out of the freezer to grill and serve with it.

20 August 2007

Gizzards in your salad

Have you ever eaten chicken gizzards? Duck gizzards? Turkey gizzards? Do you know what a gizzard is? Here's what the American Heritage Dictionary says:
giz·zard n. 1. A modified muscular pouch immediately behind the stomach in the alimentary canal of birds, having a thick lining and often containing ingested grit, which aids in the mechanical breakdown of seeds before digestion.
The gizzard is one of the things we include in the term "giblets" in English, along with the heart, liver, and neck. Sometimes we put the giblets in stuffings or in gravies. The Larousse Gastronomique says that something called "giblet-soup" is a highly prized specialty in England. I found a recipe here.

Gésiers confits — pre-cooked chicken gizzards —
being finished off in a sauté pan for use in a salad


In France, one of the luncheon salads you see in a lot of cafés and restaurants is a salade de gésiers — a gizzard salad (gésier being the French word for gizzard, obviously). I just searched for the term in my blog, and see that I wrote about gizzards earlier here. And there are a lot of recipes in French for salade de gésiers listed here.

The makings for a salade de gésiers — the tomatoes,
cucumber, and green beans are from our garden

We had a salade de gésiers for lunch yesterday. You can buy the gizzards — chicken, duck, or turkey, as you like — in little packages at the supermarket in France. They are confits, which mean they've been cooked slow and long in duck fat until they are very tender, and then vacuum-packed in a plastic pouch. You take them out of the packaging and sauté them for a few minutes in a pan and they're ready to eat.

If you don't cook gizzards for a long time at low temperature, they will be chewy, or even rubbery, because the gizzard is a tough muscle. I bought some fresh once and just sautéed them for a few minutes. They were nearly inedible (we ate them anyway, chewing vigorously).

Salade de gésiers de poulet — chicken gizzard salad

To make the gizzard salad, we had lettuce of course, some tomato wedges, a sliced cucumber, a boiled egg, some steamed green beans, and some boiled new potatoes. We dressed all that plus the gizzards with vinaigrette made with Dijon mustard, cider vinegar, and sunflower oil. Some good French bread is required, as is a glass of red wine. This salad is a full meal, not a starter course.

Gizzards do not have a strong taste. Walt said they were like eating bacon, but not as salty or fatty. I think you might have to wait until you come to France to try them, but don't be afraid to order a salade de gésiers for lunch in a French café if you get a chance.

19 August 2007

Digital cameras

Warning — geeky digital camera topic...
I've added a new digital camera to my collection. I now have a Kodak that goes back to 2001, a Canon that I got in January 2002, another Canon I bought in 2005, and now a brand new Panasonic. This probably seems a little excessive, but as you know I spend a good amount of my free time taking, processing, and posting pictures. And remember, all my time is free time these days! Such are the joys of unemploym... er, retirement.

The Canon Pro90 IS compared to the Panasonic TZ3 — both
cameras have a 10x zoom and an image stabilization feature.

The new Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3 is a replacement for a monster of an Canon camera that has served me well but now seems much too heavy to haul around much. The 2001-vintage Canon Pro90 IS weighs 24 oz. — 1½ lbs. — whereas the TZ3 weighs just 8 oz. Both cameras have a 10x zoom, and both have an image stabilization feature that makes it possible to take sharp telephoto pictures without having to use a tripod.

There is a great difference in the size of the LCD screens on
the two cameras.
The Canon Pro90 has an electronic viewfinder
that I like a lot,
while the Panasonic has no viewfinder at all.

As usual, there are a lot of trade-offs. The Canon Pro90 has a lens that extends to 370 mm, while the TZ3 only goes up to
280 mm. That means I won't get the same long shots as before, unless the "extended optical zoom" feature of the new camera works well. I haven't tried it yet. But I won't have to carry around what is the equivalent of a paving stone to take good pictures. And it's not like I'm getting rid of the Canon Pro90. As long as its batteries will continue recharging, I'll have use of it.

The Panasonic camera will probably also replace the other Canon camera I have, which is a Powershot S70 that I bought in November 2005. I've never been happy with the S70, and I think it's because it doesn't have an image stabilization feature. I get far too many blurry pictures when I use it in low-light situations. Its strong point, and it's a very strong one, is its macro feature, which lets me take great close-up shots when the light is good and bright.

The Panasonic TZ3 (silver) is not really any bigger than the Canon
S70 (black),
but it has a much longer zoom and image stabilization.

The Canon S70 has an optical viewfinder, but I almost never use it. Instead, I compose my pictures using the LCD screen. That's why I think I can live with the Panasonic camera, which doesn't have any viewfinder at all — as long as the battery doesn't get drained too quickly by the big screen. Only time and using the camera will tell me that story.

The LCD screen on the Canon S70 is much smaller
than the Panasonic TZ3's big screen.

Both the S70 and the TZ3 have good wide-angle capabilities. The lens range is 28 mm at the lower end. The S70 has a 3.6x zoom, taking it up to 100 mm at the higher end, while the TZ3 has its much better 10x/280 mm capabilities. Unless the TZ3's macro feature is pretty lame, I probably won't use the S70 much any more.

What's the price on all this? Well, I paid about $700 for the Pro90 in late 2001, $400 for the S70 in late 2005, and now a little less than $300 for the new Panasonic. These are my splurges. I hardly ever go to restaurants, I don't travel much any more, I don't buy clothes (as anybody who knows me will tell you), and I drive a tiny seven-year-old Peugeot.

One of the things I didn't want to do was buy a digital camera that used a different memory card from my other cameras, which take the big old Compact Flash cards. I have eight or ten of those old cards, in different capacities.

The TZ3 uses the newer, smaller Secure Digital (SD) cards. I thought buying one of those with sufficient capacity would add a lot to the cost of a new camera. But when I went on Amazon to see, I found I could get a 2 GB card like I wanted for ... get this ... $15.00. Even with shipping, the card, which has twice the capacity of any other memory card I have, cost less than $22.00. How could I resist that?

I bought both the new camera and the new card from Amazon in the U.S. and had them shipped to my mother in North Carolina. She then shipped them to me in France (the package took only five days to make it across the Atlantic!). Buying the same two items here, with the low dollar and the high French value-added tax (about 20%) would have cost at least twice as much.

I haven't mentioned my oldest digital camera, which is a 2000-vintage Kodak DC4800 that cost me about $400 back then. Until now, it has been the camera I use in the kitchen to take close-ups of all the food we make. It has a small screen, a 3x optical zoom, and an optical viewfinder. It has been a great camera.

The Kodak is going into retirement.

The problem with the old Kodak is that it is now very creaky. The batteries I have for it won't hold a charge for very long, and I don't really want to buy any new ones now. One advantage of the Kodak camera is that you can run it off a wall outlet, so you don't even need a battery to use it in the kitchen the way I do. But now the socket that the power cord plugs into on the camera itself is loose, making the electrical connection bad. I don't think there's anything I can do about that, so the Kodak is going into retirement.

Oh, I haven't mentioned megapixels. I'm not a megapixel believer, and certainly not a fanatic. For my purposes, 3-megapixel pictures are plenty big, and I have to reduce those in size for my blog anyway. I don't print many pictures, especially not at large sizes, and I guess having mega-megapixel pictures is good for that.

The Kodak takes pictures at 3 megapixels and the Canon Pro90 at 2.5 megapixels. The newer Canon S70 and the Panasonic TZ3 both can take 7-megapixel photos, but I set them to about 3 megapixels for my purposes.

By the way the TZ in the Panasonic TZ3 name stands for "Travel Zoom." The camera is designed to meet the needs of travelers, I guess. I hope it meets mine.